• Agents and managers can help globally earning clients like professional athletes, musical artists, and entertainers strategically manage finances and taxes across borders to maximize earnings.
• For U.S. citizens and residents earning money abroad, key areas for advisors to address include endorsement deals, royalties, foreign properties, foreign tax returns, and tax structuring that considers foreign investments.
• For foreign (non-resident) athletes, artists, and entertainers performing in the U.S., considerations include but are not limited to U.S. taxable income, withholding rules, tax status, Central Withholding Agreements (CWA), and tax treaties.

~

As an agent or manager for athletes, artists, and entertainers, many of your clients likely earn income across borders as they perform worldwide. Strategically managing their finances and taxes is crucial to maximize earnings. Proper planning can help reduce tax burdens and avoid double taxation across jurisdictions. This allows your clients to focus on their careers while you may finesse your assistance to them in optimizing their income with guidance from tax professionals.

Understanding key tax considerations can enable you to put frameworks in place to mitigate your clients’ liabilities. For clients who are citizens or residents of the United States earning money abroad, all worldwide income must be reported to the IRS. However, foreign countries also tax income earned by non-residents. Assessing relevant tax treaties and structuring contracts in an appropriate manner can lead to more advantageous tax treatment.

When your clients have income from various sources both from inside and outside the United States, proactive tax planning is key. Common international income types to consider include:

• Salaries from foreign leagues and tournaments
• Performance fees from concerts and festivals
• Royalties
• Endorsements and sponsorships
• Bonuses and prizes from international tournaments
• Merchandise sales
• Other income earned while playing or performing overseas

How these income types are classified and sourced impacts tax liabilities. Consulting tax professionals before your clients sign any deals allows for upfront planning that can keep more money in your clients’ pockets.

5 Key Considerations for U.S.-Based Athletes, Artists, and Entertainers Earning Income Abroad

If you are an advisor to musical artists, professional athletes, film actors, or other performers who are U.S. citizens, residents, or green card holders with foreign income sources, here are five important areas to address: 

1. Endorsement Deals – How will the construction of a contract impact tax treatment abroad? Will the income be considered U.S. or foreign sourced? What are some ways to proactively plan for potential tax savings?

2. Royalties – Can royalties be classified differently if content is published while clients are abroad? How are royalties affected by collaborations with international artists? Is it considered U.S. income if royalties are received while playing or performing abroad?

3. Foreign Properties – What are the tax rules surrounding your clients purchasing or renting homes abroad (rules may vary by country)? Did you know that foreign rental income may need to be disclosed on a U.S. tax return? How do investments in foreign countries get reported and taxed?

4. Foreign Tax Returns – When is return filing required for extended stays abroad? Can foreign taxes be credited (and is the credit dollar-for-dollar)? What should be expected for payments received as a contractor versus as an employee? Which expenses are deductible in each country? For example, are agent fees, travel expenses, and entertainment deductible?

5. Foreign Tax Structuring – Is it better to withhold taxes on gross revenues or after deductible expenses? How do local, state, and regional (provincial, cantonal, district, county) taxes factor in?

With these areas addressed upfront, you can maximize income and minimize overall tax burdens for your clients as opportunities arise.

5 Top Considerations for Foreign Domiciled Athletes, Artists, and Entertainers Performing or Playing in the U.S.

If you are an advisor to athlete, artist, and entertainer clients who are not residents or citizens of the U.S. but earn income in this country, areas that could have an impact on your clients’ taxes include (but are not limited to):    

1. U.S. Taxable Income – Is U.S.-sourced income taxable? What types of income may this include? Is there a requirement to file a U.S. federal income tax return? Is there an income threshold that must be met?

2. Withholding Rules – What are the withholding rules surrounding payments to foreign athletes, artists, and entertainers?

3. U.S. Tax Status – How is U.S. tax status determined — residency for income tax and domicile for transfer tax? How is taxation affected with or without a Social Security Number (SSN) or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN)?

4. Central Withholding Agreements (CWAs) – A CWA is a tool that can help entertainers and athletes who don’t live in the U.S. by having U.S. income tax withheld based on the non-resident’s income. Is a CWA beneficial for the individual’s situation?

5. Tax Treaties – Does the individual’s home country have a tax treaty with the U.S.? How does it impact tax liabilities?

Evaluating options surrounding tax statuses, withholding approaches, and applicable treaties can mitigate liabilities and optimize tax treatment for your foreign clients.

Work with Tax Professionals to Help Your Clients Maximize Global Income

As an agent or manager navigating global income for your clients, working with experienced tax professionals is key. Advisors can assess your clients’ situations across jurisdictions to put frameworks in place reducing liabilities and avoiding double taxation. With the right global tax strategy tailored to each client, you can position them to pursue worldwide career opportunities with maximum income and minimum taxes.

Need help navigating the world of international tax for athletes, artists, and entertainers? We have experienced professionals dedicated to both international tax and entertainment, sports, and media (ESM) ready to answer all your questions. Reach out to our International Tax Team today.

• State tax authorities are escalating audits of intercompany transactions, as transfer pricing crackdowns in several states are generating millions in tax revenue. 
• These state initiatives indicate growing regulatory emphasis on transfer pricing, which may encourage more aggressive audits (especially if budgets tighten). 
• Companies operating across state borders should take proactive steps, like conducting transfer pricing studies to validate policies and strengthen defenses before audits strike.

~

A recent Bloomberg article affirms state tax authorities are ramping up audits of intercompany transactions at multistate corporations. The report points to an increase in audits in three “separate-reporting” states following transfer pricing settlement initiatives as a beacon of audit activity to come across other states that take this approach. 

While not ideal for multistate operators, this development may not come as a surprise to companies with international operations who have dealt with a myriad of cross-border tax issues in recent years. Close observers of state and local tax (SALT) developments have been predicting for many years the potential that states will be adopting similar positions with respect to transfer pricing. In a 2022 article focused on SALT transfer pricing enforcement, we highlighted several key indicators that more state transfer pricing audits could be on the horizon – including state budget deficits, a surge in auditor and consultant hirings, and renewed interest among states in collaborating on multistate audits. 

With confirmation that state-driven transfer pricing audits are on the rise, it is imperative for corporations operating across state borders to assess your transfer pricing risks and fortify your documentation and audit defense strategies. 

Surge of Transfer Pricing Audits in Separate-Reporting States 

According to the Bloomberg Tax report, the recent spike in transfer pricing audit activity has predominantly affected Southeastern states categorized as separate-reporting states. Currently, there are 17 separate-reporting states in the United States. With the exception of a handful of states like Indiana, Pennsylvania, Iowa, and Delaware, most separate-reporting states are located in the Southeast region. 

How separate-reporting states differ from other states in their taxation approach to corporations: 

• In separate-reporting states, each corporation within an affiliated group is required to file its individual tax return. This treatment considers them as separate entities with independent income, recognizing intercompany transactions, and allowing for varying tax liabilities.  
• In contrast, combined-reporting states require or allow affiliated corporations within a corporate group to file a single tax return, treating them as a unitary business with shared income, often eliminating intercompany transactions. 

Notably, two Southeastern states, Louisiana and North Carolina, have recently concluded audit resolution programs that significantly boosted their state revenues. Louisiana’s program generated nearly $38 million, while North Carolina’s efforts resulted in more than $124 million. Meanwhile, New Jersey, a Mid-Atlantic state that abandoned separate reporting in favor of combined reporting in 2019, is in the midst of a transfer pricing resolution program that has already collected almost $30 million. The success of these programs in collecting tax revenue is likely to motivate other states to explore similar initiatives. 

The success and subsequent expansion of these programs signify a growing emphasis on transfer pricing at the state tax authority level. State tax agencies are enhancing their knowledge and enforcement activities in this domain, giving auditors more confidence to adjust returns in transfer pricing disputes. This increasing competency may be viewed as a valuable tool by states – both those requiring separate and combined reporting – that are seeking ways to augment revenue streams. 

Strengthen Your Transfer Pricing Defenses Before State Audits Strike 

To preemptively safeguard your business from a state transfer pricing audit, a proactive approach to validating pricing policies is essential – and a comprehensive transfer pricing study is your primary defense. 

Here are three key advantages of conducting a transfer pricing study: 

1. Document Your Transfer Pricing Policy: A transfer pricing study provides robust documentation that can counter inflated tax assessments by identifying key intercompany transactions, referencing benchmark data, and highlighting any deviations that necessitate policy adjustments. Even if your company has undertaken prior studies, annual updates are indispensable to align with evolving business landscapes and provide tax penalty protection. 

2. Mitigate Your Risk: Beyond reducing audit risks and potential liabilities, these studies also play a pivotal role in supporting major corporate events like mergers and acquisitions (M&A). By demonstrating pricing compliance, they ensure that domestic affiliates have robust documentation and effective cost allocation analysis, thus preventing over-taxation or under-taxation. 

3. Ensure Consistency: Minimize uncertainty by achieving uniform entity-specific compensation across state agencies and affiliated entities. Swift collaboration with advisors when audits arise enhances dispute resolution capabilities. 

As states continue to gain confidence in challenging transfer pricing, multistate corporations must take proactive measures to ensure the resilience of their intercompany transactions under intensified scrutiny. 

Get Ahead of the Game with a Transfer Pricing Study  

If your company engages in substantial intercompany transactions across state lines, initiating a review of your current pricing policies, preparing your transfer pricing policies, and ensuring compliance with U.S. transfer pricing rules should be a top priority. Proactive measures can help you stay ahead of potential issues before state auditors come knocking. We have a robust transfer pricing team that works closely with our State and Local (SALT) Tax and Tax Controversy practices. Through a combined effort we can support you through every stage of managing a transfer pricing audit. Talk to our transfer pricing professionals today to find out how we can help you minimize your exposure to transfer pricing audits.  

• Name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals offer athletes exciting opportunities, but also potential pitfalls if not approached strategically. 
• Athletes should educate themselves on taxes, carefully review contracts, and budget with long-term security in mind. 
• With guidance on financial obligations, agreements, and smart money management, athletes can maximize NIL benefits while safeguarding their futures.

~

You are a talented young athlete with a growing public profile. You’ve just been offered a Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deal, an opportunity that can put some extra money in your pocket or even, in some cases, make a more profound impact on your financial life. It’s an exhilarating time, but it’s also crucial to approach this new chapter with the right knowledge and mindset. 

Whether you’re a college or high-school athlete, or the trusted advisor to a young athlete, here are the three most critical actions you should take to avoid common financial pitfalls associated with NIL deals.

1. Recognize Your Tax Obligation

One of the first hurdles you’ll encounter in the world of NIL deals is taxes. It’s essential to understand that the money you earn from these deals is subject to taxation. Many young athletes overlook this, often because they’ve never had to deal with taxes before.  

To avoid potential financial trouble down the road, consider these steps: 

• Educate Yourself: Young athletes receiving payments from NIL deals are responsible for paying taxes on that income just like professional athletes. Take the time to learn about taxes, especially how they apply to your earnings. Understanding the basics of taxation will empower you to make informed decisions. 
• Consult a Tax Professional: Before signing any NIL agreement, consult with an experienced accountant, tax advisor, or business manager. They can help you calculate your tax obligations, identify potential deductions, and develop a tax strategy tailored to your situation. Along with ensuring any federal, state, and local taxes you owe are paid on time (avoiding penalties), a tax professional can also help you navigate more complex situations – such as earning income across multiple states. 
• Practice Smart Spending: Resist the urge to splurge on electronics, clothes, or cars as soon as the money starts rolling in. Create a budget that considers your future tax payments, living expenses, and financial goals. Staying disciplined with your spending is key to long-term financial success. 

2. Execute Agreements Cautiously 

Navigating NIL deals can be tricky. There are various state laws and school policies to consider, along with a number of legal “gotchas” to avoid. Here’s how you can safeguard your interests: 

• Seek Legal Advice: Before signing any NIL agreement, engage a lawyer with experience negotiating NIL and brand endorsements for athletes. An attorney with expertise in sports contracts can help you navigate the important terms in an NIL deal, such as money, exclusivity, length of the agreement, how the brand can use your name, image, and likeness, and an athlete’s delivery requirements. An experienced attorney will help you spot potential pitfalls and ensure the agreement aligns with your long-term goals. 
• Beware of “Standard” or Simplistic Agreements: When someone refers to a contract as “standard” or provides an overly simplified agreement, that should throw up a red flag. All it takes is the slightest language in your agreement to give a company unfettered rights to use your name, likeness and image in ways you never intended.  
• Follow Regulations: An experienced advisor will help you navigate specific laws and policies set by your state, school, and the NCAA regarding NIL deals. For example, you cannot share photos or videos in your team uniform with logos from other brands without first getting permission from your school or the brands. 

3. Budget Wisely for the Long Term 

While newfound wealth can be exhilarating, it’s crucial to manage your finances wisely: 

• Prioritize Needs Over Wants: When it comes to spending, prioritize essential needs over extravagant wants. Understand this financial windfall may be a one-time occurrence, so focus on building a secure future rather than indulging in immediate gratification. 
• Future-Proof Your Earnings: Instead of assuming this is a continuous stream of income, treat each deal as if it were your last. Create a budget that accounts for potential future earnings and uncertainties, ensuring you’re prepared for any scenario. 
• Explore Tax Mitigation Strategies: Consider tax mitigation strategies, such as retirement planning and deferral opportunities, to minimize your tax burden. Consulting a financial advisor can help you explore these options. 

Make the Most of Your NIL Opportunities

The legalization of NIL in college and high school sports represents an exciting shift for young athletes. It can offer game-changing money, enabling you to take care of your financial needs, along with building your brand for future growth. But with great success also comes great responsibility. Even professional athletes who’ve reached the highest pinnacles of their respective sports can end up without the financial resources they need if they don’t plan ahead. 

The good news is by recognizing the potential pitfalls and seeking professional guidance early in your NIL journey, you can better position yourself for long-term financial success. Remember, it’s not just about profiting from your name, image, and likeness today, but also securing your financial future for tomorrow. 

How We Can Help:

Our Entertainment, Sports, and Media practice understands the unique challenges athletes face at all stages of their financial journey. Whether you need assistance with tax planning, contract negotiations, or financial strategy, we’re here to guide you toward a successful future in the world of sports and NIL deals. 

This article was co-authored by Leron E. Rogers, Partner at Fox Rothschild LLP.

In this overview, our International Tax and Private Client Services teams “uncork” the complexities of tax issues that permeate the winery and vineyard industry so you can seamlessly confront tax challenges and seize tax opportunities. As financial landscapes continue to evolve, understanding these challenges becomes essential for vineyard owners, winemakers, and investors alike in their pursuit of crafting both exquisite wines and sustainable financial success. And as some new seasons start, others come to an end. When the time comes to transition the business, you will likely want a seasoned professional to guide you through.

The wine-making cycle

Generally, a vineyard or winery has a business cycle that may take various courses but the course we see most commonly goes as follows:

Organization / Creation / Purchase

The creation of the organization generally entails the creation of an appropriate legal entity. Whether this act should be taxable or not will depend on the tax attributes of the potential owners and should be reviewed to position the organization optimally for taxing purposes.

The purchase of an existing winery or vineyard should be structured in a tax efficient manner such that future depreciation and deductions are maximized for the purchaser. Typically, the maximization of deductions will be at odds with what a seller would desire, so the final decision will stem from negotiations between both the buyer(s) and seller(s). Ultimately, a good due diligence exercise is always warranted in these situations.

Operations

Both metaphorically and physically, the seasons always present themselves with a new beginning for the industry.

There are many ways to operate a winery or vineyard. You may start with raw land—and then have vines, or not. Rocky soil and warm temperatures provide an excellent environment for grapes to make Cabernet Sauvignon, for example. Cooler microclimates and sandier soil offer great growing conditions for Sauvignon Blanc. A vineyard manager may want to “test” some of the grounds and only plant a smaller portion of the plot.

When planting a new crop, it can sometimes take up to three years before a vine produces viable grapes. Veraison is that magical moment when those hard, green grapes transform into plump, juicy clusters. In white grapes, such as those used for Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay, the clusters turn from bright green to a more mellow, golden green.

Once your grapes are ready, one may harvest and then crush, press, and start the primary fermentation process. Then the aging and malolactic fermentation sets in. Towards the end of the aging process, winemakers will frequently taste the wine to ensure the flavors are just right. They do this with a “wine thief,” or a special tool that extracts a small amount of wine from the container it is aging in. This is commonly referred to as racking and bottling. Once the process is complete, then one obtains the finished bottle.

Having an appropriate cost accounting system is crucial to tracking the costs that are attributed to each step in the process — and will be the cornerstone to any tax planning you will want to implement.

Having an appropriate cost accounting system should help track the costs that are attributed at each step of the way.

Some of the tax implications that should be considered are provided below.

Qualifying for R&D tax credits

Archaeological records insinuate that wine was first produced in China around 7000 B.C., with the oldest winery in the world in Armenia. So, it’s no secret that wine making has been around for a long time. However, this doesn’t mean winery owners can’t and don’t implement new technologies or approaches to making their cultivation and fermentation methods more innovatively efficient.

And many in the industry do not claim the Research and Development (R&D) tax credit, failing to realize their research activities actually fall into the qualifying research activity (QRA) category. In fact, many daily activities you may already conduct — as well as wages paid to your employees involved in these activities — can qualify.

R&D tax credits enable your business to apply for a dollar-for-dollar reduction of your tax applied to any qualified research and development expenditures you may have. In some circumstances, these credits can be applied against payroll taxes as well. These can provide significant value to your organization, as it provides reduced tax liability and cash back so you can reinvest or apply to other needs. Companies of all sizes are eligible — and the tax definition of “qualified research” is broader than you might think, covering more than research that takes place in a lab. If you develop new or improved products, processes, and/or software to use in your operations, you could be eligible for technologically advancing the industry.

Whether it’s making unique improvements to products already available on the market or inventing something completely new, if you demonstrate you’ve experimented to resolve technological uncertainties and tackle challenges that are new to you, you could qualify. This includes new or improved beverages. The best part? You don’t have to actually achieve your goals in order to qualify.

Examples of qualifying activities

• Improving or creating bottling and packaging processes.
  • This includes bottle labeling or equipment, corks, and methods to improve filtration and shelf life. This could include new packaging designs to improve shelf life.
• Optimizing vineyard plots.
  • This can mean evaluating soil, water availability, and ground slopes for optimal grape cultivation; soil and rootstock process improvement; plant irrigation system development; and trellis improvements.
• Augmenting your production mix.
  • This can include evaluating conditions that affect winemaking like humidity, lighting, and ventilation in your barrels; developing product formulations; experimenting with new combinations for unique flavors; creating new aroma/flavor profiles and ingredient mixing methodologies; experimenting with prototype batches and preservative chemicals; developing new fermenting techniques; developing or refining press-fraction, press-yield or other crush or press trials; etc.
• Recycling efforts and techniques related to waste management along with sustainable energy technologies.

Commonly missed fixed asset tax savings opportunities

Fixed assets — i.e., property, plant, and equipment involved in your winemaking — can prove a powerful tax savings tool if you manage them correctly as well as increase your cash flow, so you can reinvest the savings or hold onto them to endure an uneven or less fruitful year.

Some of the tax opportunities you can capitalize on in the wine industry include:

• Reducing your current-year tax liabilities,
• Increasing your current-year cash flow, and
• Deferring your tax liabilities to later years.

Depreciated assets are one area you might overlook. Because wine production requires a significant amount of equipment you might not think about initially (like infrastructure and process-related electrical and plumbing hookups in your facility), you can count them in the total share of your property’s acquisition or constructed cost. The higher the percentage in assets available for shorter recovery periods, the more tax deferral opportunities you may have. Careful categorizing of assets between personal property v. real property can mean a substantial difference in tax benefit including amount and timing in a given year.

If you have implemented ways to make your winery more environmentally friendly, you may also capitalize on energy efficiency incentives. With an intensifying focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) permeating more industries, you can take advantage of available credits and deductions, which are measured against your facility’s ability to utilize alternative power systems (like solar energy) or the installation of energy efficient heating, ventilation, air condition, and lighting.

American viticulture areas

When you first purchase a vineyard, you have the option of acquiring an American Viticulture Area (AVA) intangible asset, whose value is recovered over 15 years through amortization. This provides annual deductions that lower your taxable income — a beneficial opportunity as it shifts the value out of the land that is normally not able to be depreciated.

Didn’t measure an AVA intangible when you bought your vineyard? That’s okay. An AVCA valuation can be performed — and any missed amortization deductions will be taken out from your application year.

Once the domestic tax planning is well oiled, some wineries and vineyards decide to expand.

Expanding operations

Many owners tend to expand their domestic operations, or some even venture overseas. Going offshore presents its own diverse challenges, some of which are described below.

International tax challenges

Exporting your wine abroad is a huge step — and one that can yield significant brand recognition and financial gain. Navigating the challenges associated with crossing borders and marketing in foreign markets coupled with international tax can prove extremely complex for wineries and vineyards because tax regulations vary from country to country, significantly impacting your operations and profitability. The taxes one may need to contend will be beverage taxes, customs and duties, tariffs and income tax, to name a few.

First and foremost, it’s critical that you work directly with experienced tax professionals who are knowledgeable not only about the area where your vineyard is located but also about the laws in the countries where you are exporting to. They can help you remain compliant amid the many seemingly convoluted challenges you face.

Because many countries have double taxation agreements (DTAs) to prevent the same income from being taxed twice, you should understand how these work between your home country and the countries you do business in. You certainly don’t want to be taxed twice!

Another way to successfully traverse these challenges is ensuring your transfer pricing practices are aligned with international guidelines. You’ll want your pricing transactions to remain fair between related entities to avoid tax evasion or an excessive tax burden in specific jurisdictions.

In general, it’s important to ensure you’re well versed in the tax laws of the countries you’re exporting to or operating in. That’s why a tax professional can come in handy. Different countries have different rules about importing, excise taxes, value-added taxes (VAT), and other forms of taxation that can majorly affect your business if you’re not complying.

This brings us to compliance with your reporting. Reporting all your international transactions and income is critical to avoiding penalties or legal issues. You’ll also need to consider any customs duties and tariffs, which may impact how successfully your wine competes in international markets. International tax regulations can change frequently at the hands of political, legal, or economic factors. Stay up to date on changes that could impact your business operations—or tax liabilities.

And just like the U.S. provides tax incentives, some countries do as well to encourage foreign investment and exportation. Your winery or vineyard could take advantage of these if they are available.

International tax compliance when exporting your wine can be complex. It also involves risk. Because every situation is different, you must tailor your approach based on the specific circumstances of your winery with advice from a professional knowledgeable in international tax. They can ensure you are adhering to the most updated regulations as well as maximizing your tax efficiency while remaining compliant.

From simply exporting abroad to setting up local in-country distribution operations we may assist by tailoring a strategy that best meshes with your company. A strategy many exporters use is an IC-DISC. The IC-DISC (Interest Charge-Domestic International Sales Corporation) is a federal income tax incentive for U.S. companies that may export their California wines outside of the United States. Domestic U.S. entities and sole proprietorships are eligible to receive this federal income tax savings. Our team may guide you as to whether an IC-DISC or other strategies are more suitable for you and your winery or vineyard.

Transition and succession planning

Whether you’re passing the business to the next generation or selling to a new owner, transition planning is crucial for taxes in the winery business, as it helps to ensure a smooth and successful transfer of ownership and management. However, transitioning a winery business involves complex financial transactions like asset transfers and potential restructuring. Tax efficiency is key to minimizing potential tax liabilities that could arise from poorly executed transfers. Here are some things to consider.

Minimizing your capital gains tax

Depending on if your winery has appreciated in value since its inception, transferring ownership can trigger capital gains tax. Strategizing the timing and structure of the transfer can potentially minimize these taxes through options like installment sales, gifting, or estate planning techniques. In fact, if the winery has been owned by a corporation, you might be able to sell your stock in that corporation with no taxable gains at all and/or rollover the gain into a new business, income tax free.

Navigating estate and gift tax considerations

Many wineries or vineyards are family affairs. If this is the case, you might face estate and gift tax implications. Taking advantage of exemptions and deductions can help you reduce the impact of estate and gift taxes.

Creating a smooth succession plan

Whether or not you’ve seen the popular show Succession, you know that sometimes, passing something as large as a corporation down to the next generation can cause some drama. That’s why succession planning is critical — it smooths the handover of management and ownership, which will help maintain your business’s stability and profitability. This can include a phased transition, training and development of successors, and establishing clear roles and responsibilities.

Optimizing your business structure

Different business structures have different tax implications. Knowing how to take advantage of your current structure’s tax efficiency and being open to changing it if that could prove advantageous before a transition occurs can pay dividends.

Assessing your value

Knowing the accurate value of your winery business is essential for tax purposes to calculate estate taxes or establish a fair selling price. Conducting a professional appraisal can ensure your business’s value is appropriately assessed.

Determining if you qualify for tax breaks

Some areas offer tax incentives for qualified business transfers, including reduced rates for capital gains taxes or other tax breaks. If you conduct transition planning, you can understand and leverage these applicable incentives.

Complying with tax laws and regulations.

Because tax laws and regulations can vary widely depending on where your winery or vineyard is located — not to mention they change over time — transition planning helps you stay aware of relevant tax regulations over the course of the transfer process, so you don’t incur penalties or legal issues.

Transition planning is a strategic process that analyzes the various tax implications that could affect a seamless and financially sound transition of ownership and management in your business. Tax professionals with experience in the wine industry can help you develop a transition plan tailored to your exact circumstances.

How we can help

Making and selling great wine is your top priority — which is why we’re here to help you navigate the tax challenges and seize the opportunities that can accompany following that passion. Our Private Client Services and International Tax teams are rooted in California, one of the most wine-centric regions in the world. We understand the nuances of your work while providing an external, holistic eye to help you grow and succeed. Contact us today.

• In April, the U.S. Tax Court made news when it ruled in favor of businessman Alon Farhy, who challenged the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)’s authority to assess penalties for the failure to file IRS Form 5471.  
• IRS Form 5471 is the Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations.  
• Taxpayers may be interested in filing protective refunds, and they should start the process sooner rather than later—there is a statute of limitations of two years for claiming refunds.  

• This case’s ruling could have reverberating effects when it comes to the IRS collecting additional penalties, but only time will tell.  

On April 3, 2023, the U.S. Tax Court came to a decision in the case Farhy v. Commissioner, ruling that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not have the statutory authority to assess penalties for the failure to file IRS Form 5471, or the Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, against taxpayers. It also ruled that the IRS cannot administratively collect such penalties via levy.  

Now that the IRS doesn’t have the authority to assess certain foreign information return penalties according to the court, affected taxpayers may want to file protective refund claims, even if the case goes to appeals — especially given the short statute of limitations of two years for claiming refunds. 

Our Tax Controversy team breaks down the Farhy case, as well as what it may mean for your international filings — and the future of the IRS’s penalty collections.  

The case

Alon Farhy owned 100% of a Belize corporation from 2003 until 2010, as well as 100% of another Belize corporation from 2005 until 2010. He admitted he participated in an illegal scheme to reduce his income tax and gained immunity from prosecution. However, throughout the time of his ownership of these two companies, he was required to file IRS Forms 5471 for both — but he didn’t.  

The IRS then mailed him a notice in February 2016, alerting him of his failure to file. He still didn’t file, and in November 2018, he assessed $10,000 per failure to file, per year — plus a continuation penalty of $50,000 for each year he failed to file. The IRS determined his failures to file were deliberate, and so the penalties were met with the appropriate approval within the IRS.  

Farhy didn’t dispute that he didn’t file. He also didn’t deny he failed to pay. Instead, he challenged the IRS’s legal authority to assess IRC section 6038 penalties.  

The court’s ruling

The U.S. Tax Court then held that Congress authorized the assessment for a variety of penalties — namely, those found in subchapter B of chapter 68 of subtitle F — but not for those penalties under IRC sections 6038(b)(1) and (2), which apply to Form 5471. Because these penalties were not assessable, the court decided the IRS was prohibited from proceeding with collection, and the only way the IRS can pursue collection of the taxpayer’s penalties was by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2461(a) — which allows recovery of any penalty by civil court action.  

How this court decision affects your international penalty assessments 

This case holds that the IRS may not assess penalties under IRC section 6038(b), or failure to file IRS Form 5471. The case’s ruling doesn’t mean you don’t have an obligation to file IRS Form 5471 — or any other required form.  

Ultimately, this decision is expected to have a broad reach and will affect most IRS Form 5471 filers, namely category 1, 4, and 5 filers (but not category 2 and 3 filers, who are subject to penalties under IRC section 6679).  

However, the case’s impact could permeate even deeper. For years, some practitioners have spoken out against the IRS’s systemic assessment of international information return (IIR) penalties after a return is filed late, making it impossible for taxpayers to avoid deficiency procedures. The court’s decision now reveals how a taxpayer can be protected by the judicial branch when something is deemed unfair. Farhy took a stand, challenged the system, and won — opening the door for potential challenges in the future.  

It’s uncertain as to whether the IRS will appeal the court’s decision. But it seems as though the stakes are too high for the IRS not to appeal. While we don’t know what will happen, a former IRS official has stated he expects that, for cases currently pending review by IRS Appeals, Farhy will not be viewed as controlling law yet.  

The impact of the ruling is clear and will most likely impact many taxpayers who are contesting — or who have already paid — IRC 6038 penalties. It may also affect other civil penalties where Congress has not prescribed the method of assessment in the future. 

How you should respond to the court’s decision 

You should move quickly to take advantage of the court’s decision, as there is a two-year statute of limitations from the time a tax is paid to make a protective claim for a refund. It’s likely this legislation wouldn’t affect refund claims since that would be governed by the law that existed when the penalties were assessed. Note that per IRC section 6665(a)(2), there is no distinction between payments of tax, addition to tax, penalties, or interest — so all items are treated as tax.  

If you’ve previously paid the $10,000 penalty, it’s important to file your protective claim now, unless you’ve entered into an agreement with the IRS to extend the statute of limitations, which can occur during an examination. Requesting a refund won’t ever hurt, but some practitioners believe the IRS may try to keep any penalty money it collected, even if the assessment is invalid— because, in its eyes, the claim may not be. Just know, you can file your protective claim for a refund but may not get it, at least not any time soon.   

The Farhy decision could likewise be applied to other US IRS forms, such as 5472, 8865, 8938, 926, 8858, 8854, and some argue the Farhy decision may also be applied to IRS Form 3520.   

How MGO can help

Only time will tell if the court’s decision will open the government up to additional criticisms for other penalty assessments. If you have paid your penalties and are wondering what your current options are, MGO’s experienced International Tax team can help you determine if you’re eligible to file a refund claim.  

Contact us to learn more.  

Here’s what you need to know to claim it:

• It’s a one-time abatement of any “timeliness” penalties incurred on individual income tax returns (Form 540, Form 540NR, Form 540 2EZ) for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022.  
• It’s only available to individual taxpayers subject to personal income tax law (so estates, trusts, and fiduciaries aren’t eligible). 
• It can be requested verbally or in writing starting on April 17, 2023.  
• For California taxpayers who qualify for an extended 2022 income tax return due date because of the California Winter Storms (i.e., most California taxpayers), the “timeliness” penalties that would be abated through this program should not start being imposed until after the new extended due date for that tax year – October 16, 2023. 

Which penalties are eligible?

Both the Failure to File Penalty (i.e., you did not file your tax return by the due date nor did you pay by the due date of your tax return) and the Failure to Pay Penalty (i.e., you did not pay the entire amount due by your payment due date) on California individual income tax returns for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022 are eligible for the one-time penalty abatement.  

How do I qualify?

How do I request a one-time penalty abatement? 

You can mail in a completed Form FTB 2918 or call the FTB at +1 (800) 689-4776 to request penalty abatement. 

What if I can provide that I had reasonable cause for late filing or late payment? 

If you can demonstrate that you exercised ordinary care and prudence and were nevertheless unable to file your return or pay your taxes on time, then you may qualify for penalty relief due to reasonable cause. Reasonable cause is determined on a case-by-case basis and considers all the facts of your situation.  

You may request penalty abatement based on reasonable cause by mailing in a completed Form FTB 2917 or by filling out a reasonable cause request on your MyFTB online account. Penalty abatement based on reasonable cause may – depending on the circumstances – be preferable to using up your one-time penalty abatement request.  

How we can help

If you need help with relief for your “timeliness” penalties or if you need help with any other state and local tax matters, please reach out to our experienced State and Local Tax team. 

• California now has a new tax credit called the High-Road Cannabis Tax Credit (HRCTC) available for eligible cannabis retailers and microbusinesses. 
• The credit is available for tax years starting after January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2027, and can be applied against current year (and future) income taxes.  
• To claim it, you must make a “tentative credit reservation.” 
• Expenditures that qualify include wages for full-time employees; safety-related equipment, training, and services; and workforce development and safety. 

While the cannabis industry in California has been struggling on many levels, tax credit relief has come in the form of excise tax changes for distributors and has now arrived for retailers. The High-Road Cannabis Tax Credit is a new tax credit from the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) available for cannabis retailers or microbusinesses for taxable years beginning January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2027. In order to capitalize on this opportunity, eligible calendar-year taxpayers must make a tentative credit reservation during the month of July to claim the credit on their 2023 CA income tax return. 

Who qualifies for the HRCTC 

To be eligible, you would need to meet three basic requirements.

Which expenditures qualify for the HRCTC 

There are several types of expenditures eligible for the credit with specific parameters that you would need to meet to qualify for them. Qualified expenditures are amounts that you have paid or incurred for any of the following expenses. 

Wages for full-time employees

Not every employee has to meet these requirements — but for those that do, their wages count as a qualified expenditure. First, full-time employees must be paid for no less than an average of 35 hours per week — or they must be a salaried employee paid compensation for full-time employment. 

In addition, full-time employees must be paid no less than 150% ($23.25) but no more than 350% ($54.25) of the state minimum wage. To meet the 150% minimum wage requirement, you may include the following employee benefits in qualified wages: group health insurance, childcare support, employer contributions to employer-provided retirement plans, or contributions to employer-provided pension benefits. But if you pay employees wages that surpass more than 350% of the state minimum wage, those wages are not considered a qualified expenditure.  

Safety-related equipment, training, and services 

Expenditures related to safety, training, and providing services can also qualify if they meet the following criteria: 

• Equipment primarily used by the employees of the cannabis licensee to ensure personal and occupational safety, or the safety of the business’s customers. 
• Training for nonmanagement employees on workplace hazards. (This includes safety audits, security guards, security cameras, and fire risk mitigation.) 

Workforce development and safety  

Qualified training for your employees includes: 

• Joint labor management training programs 
• Membership in a joint apprenticeship training committee registered by the Division of Apprentice Standards, and a state-recognized “high-road training partnership” (as defined in Section 14005 of the Unemployment Insurance Code).   

Available credit

The amount of available credit is equal to 25% of qualified expenditures. The aggregate credit that can be claimed by each taxpayer (as determined on a combined reporting basis) is a maximum of $250,000 per year. Any unused credit can be carried over to the following eight taxable years. Availability is limited as the total cumulative amount of HRCTC available to all taxpayers is $20 million. 

To claim the HRCTC on your California tax return, you must reduce any deduction or credit otherwise allowed for any qualified expenditure by the amount of the HRCTC allowed.

How do I make a tentative credit reservation — and when?  

You must make a tentative credit reservation (TCR) with the FTB to claim the credit. This reservation must be made online and once you’ve done so, you’ll receive an immediate confirmation. FTB currently reports that the system will be up and running by July 1, 2023, but you can start preparing now.  

How we can help

The HRCTC is a valuable tax credit opportunity for any commercial cannabis business operating in California. Determining if you qualify and calculating how much you can save could be complex. Our extensive experience in cannabis, cannabis tax, and state and local tax enables us to help you take advantage of this tax credit so you can stay focused on thriving in this ever-growing, culture-shaping industry. 

Reach out to MGO’s State and Local Tax team to find out whether you qualify for this tax credit opportunity and determine how much you could potentially save. 

• The Supreme Court of Washington State issued a landmark ruling maintaining the constitutionality of the state’s capital gains tax (CGT) by determining that it’s an excise tax, or a tax on a good or service (and not a property tax).   
• It’s imposed at a rate of 7% and taxpayers can claim a standard deduction of $250,000.   
• There are other deductions, like long-term gains from the sales of qualified family-owned small businesses and charitable contributions of more than $250,000.   
• You may be able to apply a tax credit. 

On March 24, 2023, the Supreme Court of Washington State (SCOWA) ruled 7-2 to uphold the constitutionality of the state’s controversial capital gains tax. Thus, by the April 18, 2023, deadline, Washington residents recognizing capital gains income (and nonresidents engaged in transactions occurring within the state) in 2022 will have to calculate this new tax and pay accordingly.    

Our State and Local Tax team breaks down what you need to know about this divisive tax with an impending deadline. 

The details about CGT

The CGT was created when Washington enacted Senate Bill 5096 in April 2021 with the intention of having the excise tax proceeds — projected to be nearly $415 million — fund the state’s early education and childcare programs. Charged on long-term Washington-allocated capital gains, the CGT is imposed at a rate of 7% of an individual’s federal capital gain from a sale or exchange of long-term investments that exceed $250,000. This includes stocks, bonds, businesses, and other assets.  

The controversy of CGT

This bill has generated controversy since its inception — mostly because it is categorized as an excise tax and not an income tax (Washington is one of nine states that doesn’t have income tax due to limitations in the state constitution on the state government assessing a tax on “property”). As a reminder, an excise tax is a legislated tax on the sale of specific services, activities, or goods.  

In March 2022, the Douglas County Superior Court in Washington deemed the CGT unconstitutional as an impermissible income tax that is only masquerading as an excise tax. The Court defined gains as income, and therefore property under the Washington Constitution, that the state impermissibly taxed at a non-uniform rate (i.e., the tax doesn’t apply to every resident equally, but only those whose profits exceed the $250,000 threshold). In the past, Washington’s Supreme Court has considered income as property — and property must be taxed at a flat rate. 

Since state revenue relies on sales and business taxes, taxpayers who earn the least will end up paying a higher share of their income in tax. This notion has split public opinion. Community groups and labor unions believe the tax is not just legal, it’s necessary because of its capability to create a more equitable tax system. But organizations with business interests in mind find it to be bad public policy in addition to violating the constitution.  

However, the Washington Supreme Court ruled to uphold the tax, agreeing it is constitutional as an excise tax — “levied on the sale or exchange of capital assets, not on capital assets or gains themselves.” In other words, the Court reasoned that the tax is tied not to the person’s ownership interest in the property (which would be unconstitutional), but on the transaction itself. 

Calculating your tax base

Adjusted capital gains

As mentioned, the new tax is imposed on your adjusted capital gains allocated to Washington, minus allowable deductions and exemptions. First, it starts with your federal net long-term capital gain for the tax year. It’s then adjusted by adding back long-term capital losses from sales or exchanges that are exempt or not allocated to the state. Finally, you subtract your long-term capital gains from sales or exchanges that are exempt or not allocated to the state.

Deductions

There are several deductions allowed against adjusted capital gains. Individual taxpayers are permitted a $250,000 standard deduction in calculating the CGT. But married or state-registered domestic partners that file a single federal tax return collectively have only a single $250,000 deduction. For example, if you earned $260,000 in profit from selling bonds in the past year, only $10,000 would be taxed, and the CGT owed would be $700. And if you and your husband together earned $260,000 from selling bonds, you wouldn’t get to “double” the standard deduction – you’d have the same tax bill.  

Additional deductions include long-term gains from the sales of qualified family-owned small businesses, and charitable contributions. Associated regulations do treat the sale or transfer of an interest in a “qualified family-owned small business” as a separate deduction from the charitable deduction. (Note that the “qualified family-owned small business” is not the same as the federal Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) tax exclusion — there are separate requirements). To receive the charitable deduction, you would need to contribute over $250,000, not exceeding a deduction of $100,000 in total. Consequently, if you donate $350,000, you’ll receive the maximum deduction.  

Exemptions

Certain long-term capital gains and losses from sales of capital assets are not subject to the tax. These exempt items include sales or exchanges of the following types of assets: 

• Livestock;  
• Timber;  
• Real estate, and land structures; and  
• Capital assets held in IRAs, 401(k) plans, and other qualified retirement plans 

Allocating your capital gains and losses 

If you were living in Washington at the time of a sale or exchange of intangibles (e.g., stocks, bonds, etc.), related long-term capital gains and losses are allocated to Washington. 

In addition, gains or losses from the sale or exchange of other (tangible) personal property is allocated to Washington if: 

• The property was in Washington at any time during the tax year when the sale/exchange occurred, 
• You were a Washington resident at the time of the sale/exchange, and 
• You were “not subject to the payment of an income tax or excise tax legally imposed” by another jurisdiction* on that long-term capital gain or loss. 

* Jurisdiction is defined to include not only U.S. states, political subdivisions, territories, and possessions, but also foreign countries and political subdivisions of foreign countries. 

Good news: a tax credit is available

If you’re interested in applying a tax credit against this new tax, you might be able to. Any Washington capital gains tax can qualify as a credit against the Washington business and occupation (B&O) tax — given that the B&O tax includes the gain from a transaction subject to capital gains tax (because it applies to ALL gross receipts regardless of character). 

In addition, a credit can be applied for an income or excise tax legally imposed by another jurisdiction on capital gains “derived from capital assets within the other taxing jurisdiction to the extent such capital gains are included in the taxpayer’s Washington capital gains.” 

Filing your returns

Remember, a Washington capital gains tax return is required only if tax is owed — and it must be filed on or before the due date of your federal income tax return, including extensions. But the payment of the tax is required BY the original due date of your federal income tax return, NOT including extensions. Any filing and payments must be done online using the MyDOR portal by April 18, 2023, for most taxpayers.   

How MGO can help

Keep in mind that while this tax will more than likely impact Washington residents the most, if you are a nonresident whose capital gains from the sales and exchanges of your tangible personal property is allocated to Washington, you could be affected too. Accordingly, anyone with a large gain event (other than the sale of real property) during 2022 or later years, should consider whether this tax may affect them.  

MGO’s State and Local Tax team can help you prepare and file this return and manage any of the other surprises that can occur in state and local tax. Contact us if you have additional questions about how the capital gains tax impacts your finances, or if you’re interested in additional strategies to boost your tax efficiency.   

• California Governor Newsom strives to amend the personal income tax laws to prevent wealthy taxpayers from utilizing Incomplete Gift Non-Grantor trusts.  
• California residents use this by transferring assets into trusts held by nonresident trustees in states without income tax.  
• If this legislation passes, taxpayers will no longer be able to take advantage of the strategy. 

If you reduce California income tax with an ING, Newsom is onto you

Californian legislators propose to amend the personal income tax laws to close a little-known-but-effective loophole for the wealthy by targeting Incomplete Gift Non-Grantor (ING) trusts set up in other states with more favorable income tax rules. To date, California residents have had the opportunity to transfer assets into these trusts held by nonresident trustees in states without income tax, utilizing the state’s sourcing rules to avoid the tax. If approved, this new legislation will put a stop to this tax planning strategy. 

Taxing the rich in California

As it stands, the ING trust is not commonly used. There are about 1,500 California residents with this trust in states without income tax — and if implemented, California would see a minimal revenue increase (about $30 million in the first year and $15 million in the following years). However, this would put an end to a tax planning strategy the wealthy have been using to their benefit for about 20 years.  

Because California is home to more billionaires than any other state at the same time as it also has the highest rate of poverty in the U.S., the concept of taxing the rich holds a certain appeal. In the past, Newsom has opposed proposals to raise taxes — but this proposal was included in the governor’s $223.6 billion budget plan for the next fiscal year, which begins in July. Whether the item survives the legislative process remains to be seen, but if New York’s passage of a similar law in 2014 is any indication, we are likely to see the end of this tax planning strategy for California’s ultra-rich.  

Moreover, this proposal has a retroactive element, differentiating it from New York’s and opening it up to potential lawsuits (New York trust holders had a five-month period to move their accounts to a different type of trust without incurring the tax). Newsom is pushing for the measure to begin the calendar year after its implementation.  

How the ING works (worked)

What is an ING, and why is Newsom trying to prevent its use? California taxpayers can transfer their assets into out-of-state, incomplete, non-grantor trusts (INGs), which constitute separate, taxable entities under state and federal tax law, and this move avoids California income tax on any appreciation or gains from those assets because it is “sourced” to another state based on the location of the trustee (i.e., the bank or whatever financial institution offers the trustee services in the other state). The non-grantor aspect comes into play when the taxpayer establishing the trust (the “grantor”) gives up control over managing investments or distributing assets to the trustee (contrast with a “grantor trust” in which the grantor continues to control how money is invested/distributed within the trust during their lifetime). For the trust to be deemed “incomplete,” the grantors specify how the money can be used. 

Some of the states where these trusts are typically established include Florida, Wyoming, Delaware, Nevada, Tennessee, and South Dakota. For example, a California resident (TP) may decide to transfer stock in their business into an ING established in South Dakota. If TP held the stock directly, then as a resident, all the dividends (or if he sold it, the gain) would be taxable by California on their personal income tax return. But since TP doesn’t hold the asset – the ING does – the ING recognizes the income relating to the stock. California’s current rules provide that the income is sourced to (and thus taxable in) the state where the trustee is domiciled, and for this ING that location is South Dakota, which, incidentally, does not tax this sort of income. 

Newsom is hoping that by eliminating this tax-free option, the state of California will be able to increase tax revenue in a way that will not alienate a large number of voters.

How MGO can help

If you are a California resident and currently use an ING as a tax strategy, there are steps to take now to avoid a negative impact. MGO’s experienced Private Client Services team can help you identify and implement an effective response. 

While it appears that several of the more disadvantageous provisions targeting businesses won’t make it into the final bill, others may. In addition, some temporary provisions are coming to an end, requiring businesses to take action before year end to capitalize on them. As Congress continues to negotiate the final bill, here are some areas where you could act now to reduce your business’s 2021 tax bill.

Research and experimentation

Section 174 research and experimental (R&E) expenditures generally refer to research and development costs in the experimental or laboratory sense. They include costs related to activities intended to uncover information that would eliminate uncertainty about the development or improvement of a product.
Currently, businesses can deduct R&E expenditures in the year they’re incurred or paid. Alternatively, they can capitalize and amortize the costs over at least five years. Software development costs also can be immediately expensed, amortized over five years from the date of completion or amortized over three years from the date the software is placed in service.

However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), that tax treatment is scheduled to expire after 2021. Beginning next year, you can’t deduct R&E costs in the year incurred. Instead, you must amortize such expenses incurred in the United States over five years and expenses incurred outside the country over 15 years. In addition, the TCJA requires that software development costs be treated as Sec. 174 expenses.

The BBBA may include a provision that delays the capitalization and amortization requirements to 2026, but it’s far from a sure thing. You might consider accelerating research expenses into 2021 to maximize your deductions and reduce the amount you may need to begin to capitalize starting next year.

Income and expense timing

Accelerating expenses into the current tax year and deferring income until the next year is a tried-and-true tax reduction strategy for businesses that use cash-basis accounting. These businesses might, for example, delay billing until later in December than they usually do, stock up on supplies and expedite bonus payments.

But the strategy is advised only for businesses that expect to be in the same or a lower tax bracket the following year — and you may expect greater profits in 2022, as the pandemic hopefully winds down. If that’s the case, your deductions could be worth more next year, so you’d want to delay expenses, while accelerating your collection of income. Moreover, under some proposed provisions in the BBBA, certain businesses may find themselves facing higher tax rates in 2022.

For example, the BBBA may expand the net investment income tax (NIIT) to include active business income from pass-through businesses. The owners of pass-through businesses — who report their business income on their individual income tax returns — also could be subject to a new 5% “surtax” on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) that exceeds $10 million, with an additional 3% on income of more than $25 million.

Capital assets

The traditional approach of making capital purchases before year-end remains effective for reducing taxes in 2021, bearing in mind the timing issues discussed above. Businesses can deduct 100% of the cost of new and used (subject to certain conditions) qualified property in the year the property is placed in service.
You can take advantage of this bonus depreciation by purchasing computer systems, software, vehicles, machinery, equipment and office furniture, among other items. Bonus depreciation also is available for qualified improvement property (generally, interior improvements to nonresidential real property) placed in service this year. Special rules apply to property with a longer production period.

Of course, if you face higher tax rates going forward, depreciation deductions would be worth more in the future. The good news is that you can purchase qualifying property before year-end but wait until your tax filing deadline, including extensions, to determine the optimal approach.

You can also cut your taxes in 2021 with Sec. 179 expensing (deducting the entire cost). It’s available for several types of improvements to nonresidential real property, including roofs, HVAC, fire protection systems, alarm systems and security systems.

The maximum deduction for 2021 is $1.05 million (the maximum deduction also is limited to the amount of income from business activity). The deduction begins phasing out on a dollar-for-dollar basis when qualifying property placed in service this year exceeds $2.62 million. Again, you needn’t decide whether to take the immediate deduction until filing time.

Business meals

Not every tax-cutting tactic has to be dry and dull. One temporary tax provision gives you an incentive to enjoy a little fun.

For 2021 and 2022, businesses can generally deduct 100% (compared with the normal 50%) of qualifying business meals. In addition to meals incurred at and provided by restaurants, qualifying expenses include those for company events, such as holiday parties. As many employees and customers return to the workplace for the first time after extended pandemic-related absences, a company celebration could reap you both a tax break and a valuable chance to reconnect and re-engage.

Stay tuned

The TCJA was signed into law with little more than a week left in 2017. It’s possible the BBBA similarly could come down to the wire, so be prepared to take quick action in the waning days of 2021. Turn to us for the latest information.